Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Blender 4.2: Precise Modeling Workshop
Learning Resources →

A common question arises when transitioning from one tool to another: the availability of resources. In the realm of CAD tools, the effectiveness of the software is significantly influenced by a robust and reliable snap system. When I introduce QCAD to architects, one of the first inquiries often pertains to its snap system.

Given that many are accustomed to AutoCAD, I find it helpful to demonstrate QCAD and AutoCAD side by side, comparing their functionalities.

For those seeking a visual comparison of the snap options in both software, I've prepared an image illustrating the primary locations where you can find these features in each program.

In QCAD, the Snap menu lists all available options. In contrast, AutoCAD's Osnap features are accessible in various locations, such as the lower right bar and the Shortcut menu.

An easily noticeable aspect of both software's snap systems, evident from the images, is the presence of many similar options. For example, both offer a feature to locate the midpoint of a line, albeit under different names:

  • AutoCAD: Midpoint
  • QCAD: Middle

Additionally, for situations requiring the deactivation of multiple snap points, each software provides a unique option:

  • AutoCAD: None
  • QCAD: Free

The essential takeaway is that both tools support Snap functionality, facilitating a smooth transition from AutoCAD to QCAD for drawing architectural projects or any technical drawings.

Why is QCAD a viable choice? Its open-source nature makes it suitable for small to medium-sized projects without significant issues. Being open-source allows for unrestricted use on numerous computers and devices, unlike AutoCAD, which requires a subscription and limits the number of users.

Learning QCAD and AutoCAD

Regardless of your preference between AutoCAD and QCAD, Blender 3D Architect offers resources to aid in mastering both tools:

Purchasing any of these resources supports Blender 3D Architect.

Blender 4.3 for Complete Beginners (Workshop)
Previous

BlenderBIM: Built-in tree IFC vegetation library

Next

Free furniture: Embrace chair model for Blender

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Clicky